IRC log for #cyrannus on 20151020

05:25.40*** join/#cyrannus Liquid_Ink (79d016b9@gateway/web/freenode/ip.121.208.22.185)
07:59.55*** join/#cyrannus Ghelae (0597004a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.5.151.0.74)
07:59.55*** mode/#Cyrannus [+o Ghelae] by ChanServ
08:00.04GhelaeHello.
08:01.33Liquid_InkHello there
08:01.37Liquid_InkHow are you?
08:02.20GhelaeI'm okay; how about you?
08:07.06*** join/#cyrannus ImpyDroid (~yaaic@195.19.236.52)
08:08.04*** join/#cyrannus AndroImp (~yaaic@195.19.236.52)
10:28.53*** join/#cyrannus ImpyDroid (~yaaic@195.19.236.8)
11:15.37*** join/#cyrannus ImpyDroid (~yaaic@195.19.236.34)
13:02.56*** join/#cyrannus ImpyDroid (~yaaic@host-42-152-66-217.spbmts.ru)
13:13.09*** join/#cyrannus Wormy_ (4e90a11a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.78.144.161.26)
13:29.54*** join/#cyrannus Ghelae (05970006@gateway/web/freenode/ip.5.151.0.6)
13:29.54*** mode/#Cyrannus [+o Ghelae] by ChanServ
13:32.46*** join/#cyrannus Ghel (05970006@gateway/web/freenode/ip.5.151.0.6)
13:32.46*** mode/#Cyrannus [+o Ghel] by ChanServ
13:33.00*** join/#cyrannus ImpyDroid (~yaaic@95.140.92.127)
14:00.08*** join/#cyrannus Imperios (~Imperios@95.140.92.127)
14:42.59*** join/#cyrannus Vincent20100 (46506626@gateway/web/freenode/ip.70.80.102.38)
16:03.39*** join/#cyrannus Cyrannian (uid109476@gateway/web/irccloud.com/x-hirazezlxlyzaahl)
16:03.39*** mode/#Cyrannus [+o Cyrannian] by ChanServ
16:06.50Wormy_awayCyrannian:  Gessing you saw the Star Wars trailer
16:06.55Wormy_awayguessing
16:07.25CyrannianI stayed up until 3 and sat through half an hour of confusing American Football to see it
16:07.48Wormy_awayyew
16:07.58CyrannianExciting tiems
16:08.54Wormy_awayI want to know what Kylo Ren means by saying what Vader started and couldn't finish...  Conversion of the Skywalkers?
16:09.48GhelOr killing all the Jedi?
16:10.08Wormy_awayOh yes, there's that
16:10.27Wormy_awayI want it to be something new
16:11.20Wormy_awayI have a feeling Skywalker had a twisted idea thaAt Sidious would teach resurrection so he's convert the Jedi he killed.
16:11.29Wormy_away*he'd
16:12.09GhelWhat Vader started and couldn't finish was actually redecorating his house. He'd just finished wallpapering the lounge when he had to go the Death Star.
16:12.14GhelHow's that for something new?
16:12.54Wormy_awayWell its not very exciting is it, having Kylo Ren watching paint dry.
16:14.08GhelHe gets rid of the wall between the kitchen and dining room, thus making a combined kitchen-diner, by cutting it away using his lightsaber.
16:15.06GhelIt's one of the most intense action sequences ever to take place in an interior design-themed movie.
16:15.38CyrannianOoh and by the looks of it, Starkiller Base looks as though it's an entire planet with a Superlaser built in
16:16.23Wormy_awayBeat that Homes Under the Hammer or Escape to the Country
16:16.29Cyrannianhttp://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/starwars/images/b/b7/Battle_of_Starkiller_Base.png/revision/latest?cb=20151020135556 - le run de la trench
17:02.44*** join/#cyrannus Imperios (~Imperios@95.140.92.127)
17:50.29*** join/#cyrannus The_Randomness (~chatzilla@2601:441:0:6:812f:97:5d33:cd3a)
17:50.56The_RandomnessCyrannian: http://i.imgur.com/Qqwy1V4.jpg
18:00.00*** join/#cyrannus Ghelae (05970006@gateway/web/freenode/ip.5.151.0.6)
18:00.00*** mode/#Cyrannus [+o Ghelae] by ChanServ
19:55.05*** join/#cyrannus Wormy_ (4e90a11a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.78.144.161.26)
19:57.01The_RandomnessWormy_: Did you hear about this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9UZdXJQERHE
19:57.27Wormy_Yes
19:58.04The_RandomnessWhatever it is, it'll be neat to hear what it actually is
19:58.04Wormy_Already nerdgasmd at it even though its probably not alien
19:58.37Wormy_It could be something nobody thought of, or a very unusual coincidence
19:59.25Wormy_*However*, I wouldn't be disappointed if not alien, it means our detection is getting better, and we may find more unusual things, maybe even technological
20:01.04The_RandomnessYeah
20:01.29GhelaeDetecting a group of exocomets would be a good achievement.
20:01.54The_RandomnessIndeed
20:02.29Wormy_I prefer Minutephyics' resolution to "Irresistable force meets immovable object", they are the same thing in different frames of reference https://twitter.com/neiltyson/status/654337749202415616
20:02.41Wormy_Barring that, non-physical so don't contact at all
20:03.00The_Randomnesssame
20:05.31Wormy_*un-acceleratable
20:16.56GhelaeBy definition, if any force is irresistable than no object that it acts on is immovable, and vice versa, so the latter has to be true: for both to exist, they can't interact with each other.
20:17.11GhelaeAnd Minutephysics explains why they're both the same thing anyway.
20:20.25GhelaeAlthough if you consider an object that is unacceleratable due to having infinite mass, and then put it in a gravitational field, it's still going to move: even in Newtonian gravity, the infinite mass will mean it feels an infinite force that cancels it out.
20:21.45GhelaeMind you, it would also be an infinitely-sized black hole. So your immovable object has to be immovable by some other means anyway.
20:23.29GhelaeHow an immovable object moves in curved spacetime is left as an exercise to the reader. :P
21:05.37Wormy_heh
21:07.00Wormy_Now I'm in a sciencey mood, I'm quite excited by a question that popped into my mind yesterday
21:07.32Wormy_Well when am I not in a sciencey mood hur
21:09.05Wormy_There are all sorts of systems which are mathematically universal, Mandlebrot sets (contains all possible Julia sets), universal languages, computations and genetic evolution
21:10.13Wormy_But they are all distinctly different.  By definition, if a Mandlebrot set is universal, out in infinity it must also express a lot more than just Julia sets (I could be confusing mathematical and computatioonal universality here, if there is a difference)
21:10.49Wormy_Likewise, so might these other systems
21:11.57Wormy_So could it be that the structures in each universal set are ordered differently in infinity, and could there be a measure
21:13.21GhelaeI think you may be confusing different definitions of "universal", but what the definition of "universal" is that Mandelbrot sets fall under I'm not sure.
21:14.56Wormy_Well, Stephen Wolfram seems to believe his software that like Mathematica which rely cellular automata will eventually find a description of the physical universe
21:15.11GhelaeThere is a Julia set for every rational function, so if the Mandelbrot set does contain all Julia sets, that's not limited at all.
21:16.41GhelaeIf you want to connect it to computational universality, you could probably contrive some relation involving how computers (not hypercomputers) are also limited to rational numbers.
21:17.30GhelaeSo if a computer can compute every rational function, and a Mandelbrot set contains subsets for every rational function, there's some correspondance in their universality there.
21:18.27GhelaeThat's a horrifically non-rigorous definition, but I think it works as a starting point.
21:19.04GhelaeI suppose I should say "universal Turing machine" instead of "computer" there as well.
21:20.33*** join/#cyrannus Wormy__ (4e90a11a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.78.144.161.26)
21:20.47GhelaeI'll just repeat everything I've just said.
21:20.52GhelaeThere is a Julia set for every rational function, so if the Mandelbrot set does contain all Julia sets, that's not limited at all.
21:20.55GhelaeIf you want to connect it to computational universality, you could probably contrive some relation involving how computers (not hypercomputers) are also limited to rational numbers.
21:21.00GhelaeSo if a computer can compute every rational function, and a Mandelbrot set contains subsets for every rational function, there's some correspondance in their universality there.
21:21.02GhelaeThat's a horrifically non-rigorous definition, but I think it works as a starting point.
21:21.05GhelaeI suppose I should say "universal Turing machine" instead of "computer" there as well.
21:21.17GhelaePerhaps it should also be computing any number, while noting that rational functions can involve irrational numbers.
21:21.17Wormy__Thanks
21:22.47Wormy__So, it is a bit different to how I pictured it.  Mathematical forms of universality can all be reduced to the iterations of a Universal Turing Machine, if they are computable.
21:23.35GhelaePerhaps they're analogous in some way, yes.
21:24.35Wormy__Yeah, I wouldn't state it in the way that Tureing Machines explain mandlebrots in and of themselves, but it works at a sort of meta-level
21:25.32GhelaeOn something less major but also scientific, much like how I realised planck's constant isn't actually relevant for fundamental physics (being essentially just a conversion factor), I've also realised that, when expressed in terms of the most elementary quantities, neither the speed of light c nor time t appear in any fundamental equations except as a combination ct.
21:26.18GhelaeSo it's the fourth/zeroth dimension, and c really is a conversion factor between units. Equivalently, a change in c would be identical to a change in distances or durations.
21:28.23Wormy__woa
21:29.24Wormy__So...  In a universe where c is slower, distances and durations adjust so that there wouldn't really be a difference?
21:30.13Wormy__Or have I completely misinterpreted that lol
21:30.36GhelaeThere are a few ways of thinking about it. One is that a universe in which c is smaller is identical to a universe in which durations are longer.
21:31.31GhelaeSo while you travel slower, the passage of time is equally slowed down and there's no measurable difference.
21:33.05GhelaeSo yeah, you interpreted it correctly.
21:33.35GhelaeIn terms of distances, you could say that distances are also shortened so that, while you travel slower, you have less far to go and so there's no measurable distance.
21:33.54GhelaeThat requires a bit more thinking to work out why everything being closer together has no other effects.
21:34.42GhelaeBut just as distances between objects are smaller, the distances between different parts of an object - and so the objects themselves - will be too.
21:35.16Ghelaeno measurable difference*
21:36.45Wormy__So in a universe where c is larger, you go faster, but distances would be further?
21:37.09GhelaeYes. And so the sci-fi idea of increasing the speed of light so that spaceships can fly faster... actually means making everyone perceive time pass more slowly.
21:38.17GhelaeAnd having a finite region of space where c is larger would actually be a region where geometry is warped so distances are shorter.
21:39.02GhelaeI'm remembering a certainly non-canon sentence on the SporeWikiverse's intergalactic rifts about how the speed of light is faster there and trying to figure out how that would work in practice.
21:41.04GhelaeTo get exactly the same thing I think you need *temporal* distances experienced in the rift to be longer, with passage of time slowed down (and that's essentially relativistic time dilation), so observers on the outside perceive FTL travel and observers on the inside don't notice distances being shortened by anything other than length contraction.
21:43.13GhelaeTo an extent something like that would actually happen - gravitational time dilation means time will run more quickly far away from galaxies - but not to an extent where it would make much of a difference.
21:44.50GhelaeTo appear to be FTL it'd need to be some kind of accelerating reference frame...
21:45.27Ghelaeso basically you'd need your region of space to be filled with negative-mass matter so you have a repulsive gravitational field.
21:45.48GhelaeEh, you can read it in the logs if you want to and you remember.
21:48.57*** join/#cyrannus Wormy_ (4e90a11a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.78.144.161.26)
21:50.16GhelaeIn case you're wondering, my conclusion was that to make a region space where "c is larger so ships go faster", what you actually need is a region of very dense negative mass.
21:51.14GhelaeThis causes gravitational time dilation in such a way that clocks appear to go waaaaaaaay faster inside than elsewhere. Then add relativistic time dilation to that and spaceships just go flying across it.
21:52.17GhelaeActually, I'm not sure that's right now.
21:52.31GhelaeIt's either that or exactly the opposite that you'd need.
21:54.10Wormy_Sorry, I got distracted, I am intrigued
21:55.18Wormy_This might not have made it to you
21:55.20Wormy_[22:41] <Wormy__> Of course, we talked already about how the Silver Ghost's planck zero AI wouldn't work, but even if it magically could, it would probably still take forever to give an output by the sounds of things
21:56.37GhelaeNo, that didn't get to me. I do remember some of that discussion.
21:58.29Wormy_On a slightly different topic, I imagine an STL interstellar civilisation might have something better than ultra-fast time dilation or cryogenics
21:58.57GhelaeAnd super-long lifespans / virtual realities?
21:59.12Wormy_If they had the technology to play around with mental states they could potentially slow down the perception of time and activity of persons inside
21:59.15Wormy_Yes
22:00.23GhelaeYou would also have to slow down the effects of time on the body as well. Slowed down perception will be of little use if they have to constantly eat to keep up with their much faster metabolism.
22:00.41Wormy_That should be easy enough
22:00.48GhelaeThen again, some people would probably enjoy that.
22:00.52Wormy_if you can change brains like that
22:01.17GhelaeYou get to travel through space while binging on all kinds of foods at a rate you'd never be able to do normally.
22:01.57Wormy_I think even I would like that
22:03.07Wormy_On a larger scale, could an STL civilisation deal with fluidly changing the mindstates on different planets so that all observers feel that not much time has elapsed?
22:03.48GhelaeThe problem with slowing down everybody's brain is that it allows anyone (perhaps a hostile outside force) with faster thinking to outcompete you.
22:04.37Wormy_So a ship has one twin reaching a system that might take 10 years, in our perception.  So all the planet-bound twin has to do, is make 10 years feel like 10 days
22:04.41Wormy_Ah that's true
22:05.12GhelaeAnd even your civilisation, people will realise that thinking fast is going to help them. So individuals - like that person waiting for their twin to arrive - could opt for such a system.
22:05.46GhelaeBut you'd have to autocratically enforce slowness (and have a fast-thinking defence system in place) if you want everyone to do it.
22:06.23Wormy_The choice system makes more sense.  Why should the whole planet wait for your twin to arrive?
22:06.50Wormy_What if they are waiting for travellers who have shorter journeys
22:07.38Wormy_The planet-bound twin will just have to bare missing out on 10 years of planetwide news
22:11.12GhelaePresumably the travellers who have shorter journeys will also have their minds slowed down even when they get off the spaceship. Still, I don't recommend that system.
22:12.16GhelaeI imagine there'd be all kinds of systems of place: mind-slowing, bodily stasis, uploading, generation ships, and ultrarelativistic travel.
22:12.44GhelaeYou can hardly enforce homogeneity efficiently across an interstellar STL civilisation.
22:14.35GhelaeHopefully the generation ships would include cryopods etc so if anyone wanted to see a planet in a shorter time they could do so.
22:14.44Wormy_They shouldn't need to anyway, the nature of durations for different travellers will probably effect different portions of society
22:17.39Wormy_I was trying to make it so that a story with small STL civilisations could have space a opera-like genre.
22:17.54Wormy_*a space opera
22:20.50GhelaeYou can have space opera in a single star system. But space opera = getting from A to B rapidly doesn't go well with interstellar distances if you can't ensure everyone experiences high distance-to-subjective-time ratios.
22:23.23Wormy_And like you said, all it takes is an enemy to play the system with their own ratio - to beat any enemy.  Which wouldn't make for very cool space battles.  Of course AI could protect the ship, but still
22:26.17GhelaeAlso *everything* will go faster. If hours pass like seconds then you'd hardly even be able to perceive an aeroplane flying by if it's going fast enough to keep itself in the air.
22:26.51GhelaeTo an extent the problem with AIs experiencing time faster also applies without humans artificially slowing down their own perception.
22:27.26GhelaeBut while some entities speeding up their perception is one thing, expecting the bulk of the population to slow down theirs is unreasonable.
22:30.28Wormy_There is also the issue with what kind of communication should be sent
22:31.28Wormy_So if we imagine an autocratic society that roles Sol and Alpha Centauri, they would have to communicate in one big package rather than a constant stream of news, so that when a message is sent, the slow down begins
22:32.24GhelaeI'm not sure how it makes a difference if everything in society is slowed down.
22:33.02GhelaeBut speech is a problem. Actually breathing in general is; your natural rate of ventiliation would be huge in subjective time, and you've got to oxygenate yourself somehow.
22:33.22GhelaeSo maybe even binge eating like I mentioned isn't going to be an option.
22:34.06Wormy_I imagine if you are a cyborg not really dependant on biology, stuff like that might be okay - and you could always make the experience of eating cake
22:34.07GhelaeFind another way of oxygenating your body and then you have to deal with speech. At "normal speed" you're going to take ages just making a single sound.
22:34.14Wormy_*fake
22:34.38GhelaeAnd that's not considering whether or not pitch changes.
22:35.37GhelaeAnd when your characters are all cyborgs that don't breathe or eat and communicate by wi-fi, you're already about to fall out of the space opera genre.
22:39.47Wormy_yep
22:40.36GhelaeI'm going to go now. Bye!
22:40.46Wormy_bye
23:00.20*** join/#cyrannus Liquid_Ink (79d016b9@gateway/web/freenode/ip.121.208.22.185)
23:07.27Liquid_InkHey there
23:07.32Wormy_hi

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.