| 00:24.11 | ``Erik | starseeker: I've no idea, I did a build as I left, but I've been driving, waiting for accident cleanup, and grocery shopping :D |
| 00:24.28 | starseeker | ah :-) |
| 00:24.49 | starseeker | Oh, are you redeemed now that 7.16.2 is installed? |
| 00:25.26 | ``Erik | huh? installed on what? O.o |
| 00:25.53 | ``Erik | <-- was still working on stripping down and building up a box for the port testing |
| 00:26.04 | starseeker | ISST |
| 00:26.12 | ``Erik | as for deployment, I still haven't chucked binaries around yet |
| 00:26.19 | starseeker | ah |
| 00:26.41 | ``Erik | ponders a q&d http query to alert people when an upgrade is available automagically |
| 00:30.45 | ``Erik | bought a nice fat ny strip, but it's already late and he's tired :( |
| 01:11.16 | *** join/#brlcad PrezKennedy (i=Matthew@whitecalf.net) |
| 02:08.05 | *** join/#brlcad Ralith (n=ralith@216.162.199.202) |
| 02:31.00 | *** join/#brlcad Ralith_ (n=ralith@216.162.199.202) |
| 03:17.17 | *** join/#brlcad jesica__ (n=jesica@168.226.178.125) |
| 05:05.09 | *** join/#brlcad talcite (n=matthew@69-196-191-166.dsl.teksavvy.com) |
| 06:10.30 | *** join/#brlcad Ralith (n=ralith@216.162.199.202) |
| 07:16.34 | talcite | are we using tnt v1.26 or v.3.11? |
| 07:16.51 | talcite | technically v3.11 is beta, but it's over a year old already |
| 07:17.31 | talcite | best part is that TNT doesn't come with any readmes or anything. Can't tell by looking at the package usually =) |
| 07:29.19 | talcite | Oh and we're using Jama as well? |
| 07:39.14 | talcite | Hmm. Nevermind, it looks like we're using 3.05. Found it in tnt_vec.h =S |
| 07:40.35 | talcite | Is there likely to be a problem if we upgrade to 3.11? 3.05 source is no longer available at the TNT site. |
| 09:14.03 | *** join/#brlcad roberthl_ (n=robert@rhl.me.uk) |
| 09:17.17 | *** join/#brlcad PrezKennedyII (i=Matthew@whitecalf.net) |
| 09:19.30 | *** join/#brlcad starseeker (n=starseek@BZ.BZFLAG.BZ) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 11:42.20 | *** join/#brlcad cosurg1 (n=cosurgi@atak.bl.pg.gda.pl) |
| 12:48.38 | *** join/#brlcad poolio (n=poolio@63.246.136.16) |
| 14:41.03 | *** join/#brlcad talcite (n=matthew@69-196-191-166.dsl.teksavvy.com) |
| 14:51.00 | *** join/#brlcad mafm (n=mafm@249.Red-88-11-185.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 15:17.17 | ``Erik | well now, tkpng is an odd monkey |
| 15:19.21 | brlcad | odd in the sense that he doesn't fling poo ? |
| 15:19.25 | ``Erik | suspects that it could be dumped and redone in very short order without the TEA weirdness |
| 15:19.44 | ``Erik | it implements it's own subset of PNG parsing/writing instead of just using libpng |
| 15:21.37 | ``Erik | the build for it is also fickle, I get crud about missing the symbol 'pow' in some places, the configure looks for it, but never tries to use it |
| 15:24.42 | ``Erik | imagines starseeker may've spent more effort trying to integrate it than it woulda taken to bridge between Tk_CreatePhotoImageFormat and libpng :) |
| 15:25.56 | ``Erik | ponders adding pix and bw tk image thingies to libtclcad |
| 15:29.39 | *** join/#brlcad parigaudi (n=quassel@pd95b7f5e.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 15:32.46 | *** join/#brlcad talcite (n=matthew@dhcp-143-147.mcme-students.carleton.ca) |
| 15:35.32 | *** join/#brlcad talcite (n=matthew@dhcp-143-147.mcme-students.carleton.ca) |
| 15:38.32 | CIA-38 | BRL-CAD: 03erikgreenwald * r36933 10/brlcad/trunk/NEWS: improvements to ADRT's cut mode |
| 15:41.51 | ``Erik | diff vs tag in svn is klugy :( |
| 15:48.23 | starseeker | ``Erik: it should go away altogether once Tk8.6 is out and we have it integrated |
| 15:48.30 | ``Erik | ah, 'k |
| 15:48.38 | ``Erik | didn't know 86 had core png support |
| 15:48.47 | starseeker | they're apparently basing it off of tkpng's code, too :-) |
| 15:49.07 | starseeker | so I figured if we could work using tkpng, we stood a good chance of working with vanilla 8.6 |
| 15:50.00 | ``Erik | wow, 86b1, dec 23 2008... |
| 15:50.11 | ``Erik | long beta |
| 15:50.30 | starseeker | yeah, they're doing some major rework of the Alpha OSX backend |
| 15:50.41 | starseeker | er Aqua even |
| 15:51.18 | ``Erik | ponders installing 86 on a bsd box (it's in ports) and trying to compile BRL-CAD against it O.o |
| 15:52.24 | starseeker | ``Erik: might be interesting |
| 15:52.49 | starseeker | will need to do it at some point, and I expect your bsd box will complain as loud or louder than anything else ;-) |
| 15:53.01 | ``Erik | (or making starseeker do it, since he has accounts on all these bsd boxen) |
| 16:09.42 | brlcad | starseeker: so the problem with van's code I think was isolated |
| 16:10.02 | brlcad | so you know, he was initializing his own resource structures (for smp processing) |
| 16:10.18 | brlcad | but even when you do that, you still have to init the rt_uniresource |
| 16:10.48 | brlcad | as there are many non-smp routines throughout librt that rely on the rt_uniresource for processing |
| 16:10.56 | starseeker | yeah, he emailed me too :-) |
| 16:11.18 | starseeker | excellent |
| 16:11.20 | brlcad | he didn't know that was the problem, I noticed just when I saw that snippet |
| 16:11.29 | starseeker | heh |
| 16:11.30 | brlcad | that snippet is bad |
| 16:11.41 | brlcad | it's not either, have to do both |
| 16:40.44 | talcite | hey guys. Did you use the 1.2.5 version of JAMA with the TNT stuff? |
| 16:42.31 | talcite | JAMA doesn't have version information in the comments like TNT did. Neither have readmes etc. |
| 16:50.52 | brlcad | talcite: not sure |
| 16:51.00 | brlcad | doesn't look like it was documented at the time |
| 16:51.22 | brlcad | the latest of both should work just fine |
| 16:51.50 | talcite | sounds good. I'll package those tomorrow night |
| 17:17.08 | brlcad | starseeker: have the pics |
| 17:20.02 | brlcad | 11 and 4 are probably the best, but you pick |
| 17:20.53 | brlcad | er, 12, and 4 |
| 17:31.47 | brlcad | maybe 6 |
| 17:32.05 | brlcad | http://brlcad.org/tmp/marching_tets/ |
| 17:32.21 | brlcad | 12 is probably the more interesting angle |
| 17:48.30 | brlcad | cd tkpng && make LIBTOOL="../../../libtool --mode=link" LIBTOOLDIR=".libs/" LIBS="-lz" all |
| 17:48.34 | brlcad | make[4]: *** No rule to make target `all'. Stop. |
| 17:49.23 | starseeker | erm |
| 17:49.58 | starseeker | brlcad: cool, thanks :-) |
| 18:19.22 | *** join/#brlcad IriX64 (n=Warlock@bas2-sudbury98-1177680209.dsl.bell.ca) |
| 19:00.17 | brlcad | starseeker: nicely done! |
| 19:07.33 | ``Erik | *yawn* |
| 19:12.21 | ``Erik | jama 1.2.5 and tnt 1.2.6 |
| 19:16.06 | brlcad | how'd you figure that out? |
| 19:24.57 | CIA-38 | BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r36934 10/brlcad/trunk/ (21 files in 9 dirs): assume c89, no longer define USE_PROTOTYPES directly. leave it up to the compiler, but still don't even check for it since we assume at least c89. |
| 19:41.33 | starseeker | brlcad: thanks! :-) |
| 19:46.29 | *** join/#brlcad talcite (n=matthew@dhcp-143-147.mcme-students.carleton.ca) |
| 20:05.43 | *** join/#brlcad Computer (n=Computer@unaffiliated/computer) |
| 20:11.09 | ``Erik | wild guess :D those've been the released ones for ages (and what I use as deps in fbsd) |
| 20:14.49 | ``Erik | looking at diffs of the file, only jaam_lu.h is any different, using NEAR_ZERO and renaming piv to pivot |
| 20:17.47 | ``Erik | and ayup, the diff's of jama_lu.h make it look like all those differences were added on dec 02, 2009 by someone named 'brlcad' :) it's 1.2.5 |
| 21:34.28 | *** join/#brlcad louipc (n=louipc@archlinux/trusteduser/louipc) |
| 21:35.37 | *** part/#brlcad louipc (n=louipc@archlinux/trusteduser/louipc) |
| 21:36.21 | *** join/#brlcad louipc (n=louipc@archlinux/trusteduser/louipc) |
| 21:36.36 | *** part/#brlcad louipc (n=louipc@archlinux/trusteduser/louipc) |
| 21:38.23 | *** join/#brlcad louipc (n=louipc@archlinux/trusteduser/louipc) |
| 22:51.39 | ``Erik | huh http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dadPWhEhVk wonder what his software stack was |
| 23:20.01 | *** join/#brlcad R0b0t1 (n=Enigma@unaffiliated/r0b0t1) |