IRC log for #brlcad on 20071101

00:40.24*** join/#brlcad IriX64 (n=mariodot@bas2-sudbury98-1096601470.dsl.bell.ca)
00:42.00IriX64http://rafb.net/p/hng0Fb41.html <--- new kids on the block have a problem
01:05.57IriX64http://rafb.net/p/HmDN2c78.html  <--- found a critter in ltmain.sh
01:12.55``Erikheh, EBCDIC, that's funny
01:13.10IriX64not if you work for ibm :)
01:13.23``Erikerm
01:13.36``Erikand the last ibm that used that was what, the as400?
01:13.47IriX64mv370 :)
01:14.49IriX64doesn't solve *my problem tho, but what the heck
01:15.25``Erikor ebcdic->ascii... I don't remember anymore
01:15.29IriX64why not 8086
01:16.29IriX64the glory of unix=the iron doesn't matter :)
01:17.04``Erikum, it was mostly 8086 crap, but 286 stuff was permitted
01:17.11``Erikfor some reason, 386 was not
01:17.17``Erikand this was, like, '98 or '99 :(
01:17.23``Erik(my second run at college)
01:17.27IriX64was that around at that time
01:17.42IriX64ah it was
01:17.44``Erikpentium was around in like '95
01:18.10IriX64my memories like yours too far back to be accurate :)
01:18.24``ErikI sure enjoyed doing asm on r2k a lot more
01:18.31``Erikeven though it was just using 'spim'
01:18.35*** join/#brlcad rpaddock (n=bob_padd@c-24-131-109-50.hsd1.oh.comcast.net)
01:18.43IriX64don't know r2k or is that r2d2 :)
01:18.55``Erikr2000, early MIPS chip
01:19.00IriX64ah
01:19.05``Erikum, predecessor to what you may've seen in an sgi
01:19.20``Erikthe o2 bookend I have sports an r10k
01:19.29IriX64im only familiar with pc's and dec schtuff
01:19.40``Erikalphas were almost good
01:19.47IriX64still are
01:19.51``Erikif they woulda used the right endian, I coulda loved 'em :D
01:19.56IriX64heh
01:20.08``Erikthey also did very horrible things
01:20.09IriX64hate reversals do you
01:20.32IriX64?? prioris
01:20.37``Erikyeah
01:20.42``Erikshaped like a coffee table
01:20.48IriX64dont know that one
01:20.54``Erikcabinet for like 8 scsi drives, big honkin' backplane board
01:21.02IriX64ah
01:21.03``Erikthe cpu and memory boards popped into the backplane
01:21.12``ErikI had a dual p133 cpu card
01:21.20IriX64unibus machine or omnibus
01:21.31``Erikand like an 8 slot 30pin simm card
01:21.35``Erikum, eisa
01:21.41``Erikit was all eisa
01:21.45IriX64ah a dec pc attempt
01:21.48``Erikyes
01:21.50``Erik...
01:21.52``Erikp133's...
01:21.55``Eriksimm...
01:21.58IriX64i know
01:22.12``Erikcheaper than, say, an sbus equiped machine... but...
01:22.19IriX64never seen it the rainbow tho i played with
01:22.31``Erikamusingly enough, I couldn't get nt3.51 or nt4 to install on it... linux took it though
01:22.38``Erikthe alphas were a hell of a lot better
01:22.40IriX64heh
01:22.48``Erik27xsoemthingsomething...
01:23.03IriX64depends who you talk to :)
01:23.06``Erikdamn fast, both in crunch per clock and in straight clock at the time
01:23.23``Erikand I think the nt on alpha had... real smart shit.
01:23.41IriX64remember the alpha with nt
01:23.49IriX64nice enoufgh
01:23.50``ErikI'm under the impression (having never used it) that it had a machine code translator that cached the converted machine code
01:23.53IriX64enough
01:24.12``Erikso you could slap an i386 program on it, run it, it'd sit and spin for a minute the first time... then run just fine
01:24.19``Eriknext time  ya launched it, it just popped right up and worked
01:24.26IriX64i was happy i could do serial port stuff with it
01:24.57``Erikoh, yeah, ya got leenewx or fbsd, PIC chips, and a programmer?
01:25.16``Erikwhat's his name is making a new release of picprog and wants people to test the new serial timing code :D
01:25.38IriX64seriously? i'm a hobbiest :)
01:26.15``Erikthis is free software kinda targetting the hobbyist
01:26.35``Erikhe has a short lift of people he knew were interested (I maintain the fbsd port, so I was on it)
01:26.53``Erikbut I only have a couple 16f88's and haven't done anything honestly noteworthy with 'em
01:27.06``Erikother than making LED's blink in patterns
01:27.12IriX64don't have the tools man
01:27.20``Eriksoftware or hw?
01:27.24IriX64hw
01:27.26``Erikah
01:27.36``Erikthe programmer I got was like $15, and the chips were like 2.50 a pop
01:27.47``Erikthe serial cable was probably the most expensive part, I think it was $20 :(
01:28.02IriX64got enough to keep me busy but thanks
01:28.09``Erikbut I already had a breadboard and a huge box o' parts
01:28.51``Erikand a 5w cheap power supply I made from the transformer out of a cheap broken alarm clock, 4 diodes, 2 caps and a resistor :D
01:29.01IriX64heh
01:29.09``Erikoh, and a candle to drop wax on the assembly once I was happy with the output DC signal
01:29.13IriX64zeners are cheap
01:29.31``Erikyeah, btu I didn't have any
01:29.44IriX64:(
01:29.52``Erik<-- scratches his head and wonders how zeners would simplify a bridge
01:30.00IriX64heh
01:30.03IriX64wouldn't
01:30.17IriX64just stating that they're cheap :)
01:30.22``Erikthe kind I had were the cheapest, not even germaniums
01:30.34``Erikthe ones that you used to be able to get at radioshack in a package of like 100 for $2
01:30.41``Erikback when radioshack did that kinda thing
01:30.44IriX64sliconized mutational diodes were they
01:31.00``ErikI've have to look... the cheapest on the rac
01:31.03``Erikper unit
01:31.06IriX64heh
01:31.21``ErikI have way more ceramic caps than electrolytics, too
01:31.38IriX64teardrops too are cheap
01:31.41``Erikmy big dollar stuff is mostly the 74xx series ic's I think
01:32.02IriX64the hobbisyts friend standard ttl
01:32.12``Erikthought I have a few "weird" items, like a 10 bar LED, and a couple 8 piece LED's
01:32.22``Erik555's and 556's, some 741's I think
01:32.35IriX64stuff like that gets costly too
01:32.45``Erikthe LED's? or the ic's?
01:32.50IriX64leds
01:32.52``Erikthe ic's are ass cheap, common as hell
01:32.57IriX64true
01:33.02``Erikyeah, I think they were a few bucks each
01:33.03IriX64not 741's tho
01:33.20``Erikhum, I got a box with several 741's for a couple bucks
01:33.27IriX64555 are as common as dirt as far as timer chips go
01:33.29``Erikhave yet to find a good use for an opamp like that
01:34.17``ErikI want to buy an m68020 or something, some crud for memory, mebbe something to do video signals... see if I can make me a little unix machine
01:34.24``Erikand code up a unix workalike on it :D
01:34.27IriX64the memory data book as usefull as the ttl data book
01:34.39``ErikI think the 20 introduced the mmu
01:34.47IriX64i have faichild what do you use
01:34.53IriX64fairchild
01:35.00``Erikhuh?
01:35.03IriX64for reference
01:35.09IriX64books now
01:35.11``Erikum, these days? the intarweb
01:35.22IriX64i prefer paper in my hand
01:35.42``ErikI used to have, um, the little paperbacks with the grid pattern on the cover that you could get at radioshack
01:35.48``Erikbtu they're at my parents
01:35.57IriX64never used those
01:36.07``ErikI have a notebook with the pinouts for msot of those chips from a college class
01:36.15``Erikhand drawn notes from class
01:36.15IriX64ah
01:36.25``ErikI was introduced to the 74xx's in a class
01:36.42``Erikand the 555 and 556 were just that damn common, that I put those in there, too
01:36.51IriX64i was introduced to them in industry
01:37.04``Erikthe 741, I have a book from one of those ancient "101 projects in electronics" kids
01:37.04``Erikkits
01:37.14IriX64ah
01:37.17``Eriktoo bad those don't seem to exist anymore
01:37.37IriX64i never looked , really they stopped them
01:37.55``ErikI know the chemistry kits are gone, I haven't SEEN an electronics kit
01:38.06IriX64blargh
01:38.23IriX64kids used to eat those up
01:38.33``Erikchemistry kits were beaten down by politics, cuz, uh, some of those chemicals might possibly create something dangerous if mixed just right
01:39.03IriX64heh and leave it to a bright kid to "mix" them right :)
01:39.41``Erik<-- personally kinda thinks parents should be more involved and should be more education *shrug* :/
01:40.32``Erikand if'n ya dick with anything ya don't know, understand it may be a little dangerous and learn appropriate safety policies
01:40.33IriX64truth
01:40.50IriX64well its making again, bbiab
01:52.04*** join/#brlcad yukonbob (n=yukonbob@CPE001125477e9c-CM0011e6be27b1.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
02:05.55*** part/#brlcad rpaddock (n=bob_padd@c-24-131-109-50.hsd1.oh.comcast.net)
02:35.38``Erikoh ho ho
02:35.41``Erikhow ironical
02:35.48``Erikhttp://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/31/2256206
03:03.15IriX64heheh they heard you
03:58.06``Erikstarting about 6 years ago.
05:37.49IriX64man there's a dnl without a preceding # in configure.in in tk/unix
05:43.31IriX64the ' in don't presents a problem
06:18.26IriX64http://www3.sympatico.ca/mario.dulisse2/7.8.4doesvista64.png   :)
06:35.26IriX64nite all
08:16.27*** join/#brlcad Z80-Boy (n=clock@zux221-122-143.adsl.green.ch)
09:29.13*** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p5487576C.dip.t-dialin.net)
09:39.48*** join/#brlcad rpaddock (n=bob_padd@c-24-131-109-50.hsd1.oh.comcast.net)
10:08.52*** part/#brlcad rpaddock (n=bob_padd@c-24-131-109-50.hsd1.oh.comcast.net)
10:46.02*** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@dslb-088-070-022-084.pools.arcor-ip.net)
12:50.49*** join/#brlcad SWPadnos_ (n=Me@dsl245.esjtvtli.sover.net)
13:26.08*** join/#brlcad bpoole (n=bpoole@UNIX39.andrew.cmu.edu)
13:26.47*** join/#brlcad elite01_ (n=elite01@dslb-088-070-022-084.pools.arcor-ip.net)
13:31.55*** join/#brlcad PrezKennedy (i=Matt@74.86.45.130)
13:42.30*** join/#brlcad bobbmt (n=user@static-71-240-124-130.pitbpa.east.verizon.net)
14:47.13*** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p5487576C.dip.t-dialin.net)
15:02.02CIA-27BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/include/conf/Makefile.am: need all-am to be dependent upon built_sources else someone doing a make install without first running make will end up failing to generate the COUNT, DATE, HOST, USER, PATH files
15:02.22CIA-27BRL-CAD: 03brlcad 07STABLE * 10brlcad/include/conf/Makefile.am: merge from head, need built_sources for all-am
15:03.07``Erikit ist time to do the big honkin' join?
15:05.38brlcadnot yet
15:05.53brlcadnot until the remaining builds are posted
15:06.03brlcad(still need irix and solaris)
15:07.43brlcadthis will possibly be the last irix release :(
15:08.42``Erikheh
15:25.26*** join/#brlcad nita (n=nita@i-83-67-61-194.freedom2surf.net)
15:25.53*** join/#brlcad MinuteElectron (n=MinuteEl@silentflame/member/pdpc.base.minuteelectron)
15:36.27*** join/#brlcad Elperion (n=Bary@p5487576C.dip.t-dialin.net)
18:18.26*** join/#brlcad yukonbob (n=yukonbob@CPE001125477e9c-CM0011e6be27b1.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
18:46.52dtidrow_workbrlcad: yep, IRIX is a dying OS  :-\
18:47.12dtidrow_workthe company isn't doing much better, afaik
18:54.09PrezKennedypeople still use IRIX?
19:20.40*** join/#brlcad IriX64 (n=mariodot@bas2-sudbury98-1096601470.dsl.bell.ca)
19:21.07IriX64http://rafb.net/p/I3oL3a29.html   <---- have i reported this already?
19:23.06minutePrezKennedy: HAHA
19:31.48*** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@dslb-088-070-022-084.pools.arcor-ip.net)
19:34.19IriX64pssst, there's 9 dnl's in config.in in src/other/tk/unix.
19:35.54IriX64some in tcl too
19:37.38IriX64http://rafb.net/p/BEB5Wr15.html <---- rtsrv duplicates bu_bomb too
19:41.27*** join/#brlcad MinuteElectorn (n=MinuteEl@cpc4-flit1-0-0-cust283.lutn.cable.ntl.com)
19:42.29IriX64errr +o  :)
19:52.55``Erikum, ok?
19:53.07IriX64so eh :)
19:53.37``Erik'dnl' is m4 for a line comment (do not list or something)... autoconf will remove thos elines when the configure script is generated
19:53.59IriX64my build platform is kinda weird ``Erik so i'm not sure....
19:54.03``Erik<-- personally prefers shell comments as he looks through the generated configure script more often than he'd like
19:55.54*** join/#brlcad iMinute (n=MinuteEl@silentflame/member/pdpc.base.minuteelectron)
19:58.06*** join/#brlcad Z80-Boy (i=clock@77-56-72-166.dclient.hispeed.ch)
20:17.16*** join/#brlcad IriX64 (n=mariodot@bas2-sudbury98-1096601470.dsl.bell.ca)
20:21.46brlcadIriX64: it *intentionally* duplicates bu_bomb as a scope override -- there's some compiler flag amiss if it's complaining about it
20:22.25brlcadand the dnl's are normal, part of m4 syntax
20:22.36brlcadthere are dnl's throughout our own top-level configure.ac
20:24.36IriX64i'll check my flags then thanks
20:25.00brlcadcheck the gcc documentation
20:25.11IriX64way ahead of you :)
20:26.31IriX64found --allow-multiple-definition, will that do it
20:30.01brlcadmaybe
20:30.53brlcadmy gcc nor ld has that option, so can't be sure
20:31.11brlcadif it's a linker option, it'll need to be an LDFLAGS instead of a CFLAGS
20:34.15CIA-27BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/src/util/pix-png.1: clarify that the user must specify the size if the image is not 512x512
20:47.49*** join/#brlcad minute (n=MinuteEl@silentflame/member/pdpc.base.minuteelectron)
20:49.29*** join/#brlcad MinuteElectron (n=MinuteEl@silentflame/member/pdpc.base.minuteelectron)
21:06.02*** join/#brlcad iMinute (n=MinuteEl@silentflame/member/pdpc.base.minuteelectron)
21:10.46*** join/#brlcad yukonbob (n=yukonbob@CPE001125477e9c-CM0011e6be27b1.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
21:30.04iMinute=auit
21:30.07iMinuteoops
21:30.09iMinutewrong channel
21:36.48brlcaddamn skippy!
21:37.42iMinutehmm?
21:37.45iMinuteoh
21:37.47iMinutestarfox
21:37.47brlcadnvr mind :)
21:37.49iMinutehehe
21:38.00iMinute:D
21:38.13brlcad:D
21:49.36*** join/#brlcad elite01 (n=elite01@dslb-088-070-029-010.pools.arcor-ip.net)
21:51.29CIA-27BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/src/util/pix-png.c: warn if the output PNG image dimensions are smaller than the input PIX image, related to support request from mallory
21:57.20CIA-27BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/NEWS: (log message trimmed)
21:57.22CIA-27BRL-CAD: pix-png now warns the user if the PNG being created has image dimenions smaller
21:57.24CIA-27BRL-CAD: than the PIX file that was given as input. The tool compares the size of the
21:57.26CIA-27BRL-CAD: input and output images, and reports the difference if there is one; it also
21:57.28CIA-27BRL-CAD: suggest what flags the user may need to use if the input has recognizable image
21:57.30CIA-27BRL-CAD: dimensions. This feature was implemented in response to a support request from
21:57.32CIA-27BRL-CAD: Mallory where he was confused by the black PNG image produced (which happened to
22:01.39CIA-27BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * 10brlcad/BUGS: mged isn't updating the graphics window with the new 8.5 tcl (sometimes)
22:05.07*** join/#brlcad rpaddock (n=bob_padd@c-24-131-109-50.hsd1.oh.comcast.net)
22:26.50*** join/#brlcad MinuteElectron (n=MinuteEl@silentflame/member/pdpc.base.minuteelectron)
22:44.29brlcad95k for just under 4TB with support, without discounts
22:45.50IriX64brlcad=deep pockets?  :)
22:47.53brlcadheh, no
22:48.03IriX64:)
22:52.13starseekerThe unthinkable has happened - the STIX fonts have reached a Beta release
22:52.32starseekerhttp://www.stixfonts.org/
22:52.34brlcadmm.. $50k for a 12TB decked out Mac
22:52.52starseekerDrool...
22:53.15starseeker(not that BRL-CAD is likely to need the STIX fonts, I suppose...)
22:53.27brlcadstarseeker: hmm, interesting
22:54.02*** part/#brlcad ewilhelm (n=ewilhelm@pool-71-111-49-155.ptldor.dsl-w.verizon.net)
22:54.11starseekerThat's roughly the scientific equivalent of Duke Nukem Forever being released ;-)
22:54.12brlcadthat actually is pretty interesting
22:54.43brlcadnew modeler is going to ship with fonts, sounds like stix might be what we'd want to go with
22:54.46starseekerIf you download 'em, watch out for the zip file - it dumps everything into the same directory as the zip file itself is in
22:54.52starseekercool :-)
22:54.54brlcadpresuming freetype can read them
22:55.04starseekerone would hope :-)
22:55.22brlcadlooks like at least their "goal" is TTF's
22:55.40starseekerYes - if it doesn't do what you need it's probably a bug they want to hear about
22:56.17brlcadbah, they seriously need a "screenshots" page ...
22:56.38brlcadnot a glyphs page that requires me to install them
22:57.39starseekeragreed
22:58.36brlcadI have a sampling of decent free fonts that I was going to use, but a project dedicated to making good scientific fonts would be even better
22:59.33brlcadmm.. fun, 7.10.4 Mac install of BRL-CAD is nearly 500MB
22:59.36``Erikhum
22:59.39brlcadgranted, that's with debugging symbols
22:59.57``Erik"t2" is of the t1000 family?
23:00.19``Erikthis time, we dont' have to crush it, it's here to save us from the goopy one? O.o :D
23:01.11brlcadwe didn't have to crush it the first time .. someone and someone else just thought it'd be fun to set up and play with
23:01.26louipcwow my install is just 96M
23:01.40brlcadlouipc: is that stripped?
23:01.53louipcwell it doesn't have tcl...
23:01.53``Erikstripped, space optimized and 32 bit?
23:02.11louipcnot stripped but 32 bit yep
23:02.16``Eriktcl is a big space consumer, all those extra man pages, tz files, tcl files, ...
23:02.25brlcadoooh, good point, I was going to make these universal binaries...
23:02.29brlcadthat'll make them 2x
23:02.34``Erikum, libtool is fond of stripping on install
23:02.46brlcadit's not supposed to
23:02.50brlcadthere's a flag for stripping
23:02.51``Erikgo into like src/fb, type "make install" and see if it's getting the -s
23:03.02``ErikI've seen it 'just happen' before... unless I'm completely outta it :D
23:03.36``Erikthe t5220 would be better on infrastructure than the apple, I think...
23:03.40brlcadhttp://bzflag.bz/~sean/tmp/quote.pdf  is kinda what I'm thinking of
23:05.13brlcadit would be better of course, just not sure about it for the price point given with that price diff there could even be <1hr on-site support
23:05.28``Erikoh yeah, they saddle up for that support
23:05.59brlcadi mean the apple could be configured for <1hr for less than the sun
23:06.09``Erikbut, um, is it to be a file server or a compute server?
23:06.17*** join/#brlcad rpaddock (n=bob_padd@c-24-131-109-50.hsd1.oh.comcast.net)
23:06.18brlcadthe sun is configured for same day iirc, woulda cost more for less
23:06.31``Erik<-- not keen on mixing the two, kinda likes the seperation of services
23:07.12brlcadit's neither and both, needs to be big enough to fit all the data and fast enough to not be annoying
23:08.01``Erikthat'll give us, what, ~3tb live at raid5?
23:08.06brlcadwhich is probably a few TB, really fast disks, not sucky cpus .. bus bandwidths, wide pipes
23:08.22``Erikor almost 2 at 0+1 ?
23:08.28brlcadyeah, about that much
23:08.44``Erikare they still windowed big endian chips?
23:08.47``Erikor didja look?
23:08.56brlcadyeah, that was something else I liked
23:09.08brlcadone of the few big end servers remaining
23:09.14``Erikwe'd be able to retire the e420 when it goes out of service
23:09.39brlcadthe new "super" threading servers, able to run 64 threads simultaneously without skipping a beat
23:09.52brlcadthat would be *really interesting to test out
23:10.23``Erik<-- likes suns cuz he did sysadmin at a place where downtime was measured in millions an hour :) the price was never an issue, so'z is not used to really judging that angle
23:10.42``Erikwe can always apply for a 60 day test ride
23:10.56``Erikheh
23:11.18brlcadthey also undoubtedly paid 7 figures for their infrastructure :P
23:11.38``Erikwhen I lived in a place where the entire mgmt chain cared about getting shit done instead of politics, we had so many $'s in sun, they'd loan us high end (like 4800, 6800) boxes for a year at a whack
23:12.01``Erikuhm, more than 7... :)
23:12.25brlcadmeant at least 7
23:13.03``Erikthe, uh, maintenance, staff, infrastructure, etc costs for the admin/web/it/softwaredev was in the rough neighborhood of a billion a year
23:13.37brlcadyeah, that's counting too much (for what is being compared)
23:13.40``Erikand it wasn't seen as "productive" from the other companies, so under constant attack to defend those $'s
23:13.44brlcadthe orgs are massively different in size too
23:13.45``Erikyeah, tha'ts the only number I know
23:14.07``ErikI showed up when I wanted, left when I wanted, more or less did what I wanted, and got paid a lot more than I do here :)
23:14.38brlcadfor any reasonably small dev team, I think it's reasonable to try to stay under 6 figures
23:14.46``Erikyeah
23:14.54brlcadso then .. uh,  why'd you leave? :P
23:15.18brlcadthose $$'s were too much apparently ;)
23:15.38``Erikwas a limited contract to perm position, and bullshit politics lost me on the pickup
23:16.15``Erika cohort who changed teams got the inside scoop from some people, the "you didn't hear this, but" word was that I was seen talking to the wrong people (the guys on my team who quit for google right after I was jobless)
23:17.17brlcadno strip on install
23:17.25``ErikI was in one of those pesky rogue groups that doesn't play buy the corporate rules and outshines everyone with success, and useless politicos really hate that :D
23:18.07brlcadsounds like how the cad team used to be
23:18.31``Erikhrm, should be less than a 4x size bump for just 64b/uni over 32/PF... must be the tickle
23:18.52``Erikthere were traces of that bubble when I got here :(
23:18.58brlcadi haven't made the uni yet, just going by estimates I have from other builds
23:19.22brlcader, and that should be about 2x .. not 4x
23:19.30brlcadi expect about a 1GB install
23:20.03``Erikhrm, uni should about be 2x... does... wait, you're on an i386 apple, not a g5?
23:20.13``Erikdoes g5 have variable width opcodes?
23:20.16brlcad2GB if I make all four platforms (32 ppc, 64 ppc, 32 x86, 64 x86)
23:20.44``Erikis there 64b x86 on apple? O.o :D
23:20.53brlcadoh, you got 4x off what it'd be stripped
23:21.13brlcadthe strip savings is more in tune with just how much symbolage there is
23:21.19``Erikunix (2x) * 64b (2x) is what I was thinking
23:21.33``Eriker
23:21.35``Erikuni
23:21.50``Erikheh, damn muscle memory :D I talk about unix way too much, apparently
23:22.12brlcadyeah, 10.4 has 64bit support and 10.5 has it through and through
23:22.29``ErikI didn't think the core duos had that support
23:22.50brlcadthe workstations are quad-core xeons
23:23.04``Erikat most, the EMT64 memory hack, not 64b arithmatic and stuff
23:23.06brlcadlaptpos are core 2 duos
23:23.22``Erikokie, I haven't looked at asm notions on the footrest yet
23:23.31brlcadeither way, it works -- i've compiled the 4-way uni binaries :)
23:24.03brlcadand they do kick in on the new workstations if you go 64bit
23:24.06``Erikthe 4 core opteron fbsd box seems to compile faster, so'z I use it
23:24.41brlcadyeah, apple has their own optimization loop that does "a little bit better" than gcc's default, but takes way longer
23:24.57brlcadused to be massive difference
23:25.16``Erikthat, the short&quick bsd land file ops seem significantly slower (perhaps the mach layer)
23:25.46brlcada compile on my old laptop took an hour under mac os x, and 20 minutes on the same hardware running yellow dog linux, same version of gcc
23:25.53``Erikand I haven't gotten the tuning to allow bunches of processes to run in parallel, so'z I keep running into fork resource unavaiable crap when I try to od things fast :D
23:26.16brlcadah, you have to bump up your limit
23:26.20brlcadit's not set for devs by default
23:26.31``Eriknow, if you took, say, a huge single .c file and compiled it with -pipe, what was the difference? :D
23:26.43``Erikno, at least, not devs who work in terminal.
23:27.08brlcadit was way slower even on single file -- that was one of the tests I ran
23:27.27brlcadi don't remember those exact numbers, but it was more than 2x at O3
23:27.48``Erikand O0? :D
23:27.50brlcadand after talking to some of the apple devs, they commented on their custom optimization loop
23:28.39brlcadthey got a couple of the old mipspro compiler guys as well, put them to work
23:29.35brlcadyou should check your sysctl kern.maxproc -- it should be > 512
23:33.31``Erikhum
23:33.41``ErikI think I made it 4x, and that alleviated it a LITTLE
23:33.50``Erikbut I think that was still fairly shy of 512
23:42.43*** join/#brlcad Twingy (n=justin@74.92.144.217)
23:52.02``Erikmebbe it's maxprocperuid that's got me down

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.