IRC log for #asterisk-bugs on 20080214

00:05.01*** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir)
02:49.08*** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=dwayne@216.207.245.1)
02:49.08*** join/#asterisk-bugs Juggie (i=Juggie@CPE001601df17fb-CM001a6682d7b6.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
02:49.08*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+oo Deeewayne Juggie] by irc.freenode.net
02:49.10*** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-dig (i=indigo@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
02:49.10*** join/#asterisk-bugs MuffinMan (n=muffins@neutrino.joshua-colp.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
02:49.10*** join/#asterisk-bugs file (n=file@asterisk/developer-and-muffin-lover/file) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
02:49.10*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+oo Corydon76-dig file] by irc.freenode.net
02:52.34*** join/#asterisk-bugs Pagautas (n=bigman@83.171.14.250) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
03:02.11*** join/#asterisk-bugs jsmith (n=nnjsmith@72.21.36.138)
03:02.11*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o jsmith] by ChanServ
03:27.52*** join/#asterisk-bugs russellb (n=russell@asterisk/developer-and-stable-maintainer/drumkilla)
03:27.52*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o russellb] by ChanServ
04:16.07*** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir)
04:44.14*** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir)
07:30.37*** join/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@ip-212-18.sn1.eutelia.it)
08:18.12*** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@soll4-125.cust.blixtvik.net)
08:29.34*** join/#asterisk-bugs snuff-home (i=snuff@220-253-11-146.VIC.netspace.net.au)
09:53.07*** join/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@ip-212-18.sn1.eutelia.it)
10:28.18*** join/#asterisk-bugs snuff-home (i=snuff@220-253-11-146.VIC.netspace.net.au)
11:56.29*** join/#asterisk-bugs infobot (i=ibot@pdpc/supporter/active/TimRiker/bot/apt)
11:56.29*** topic/#asterisk-bugs is Asterisk Bugs Discussion -=- http://bugs.digium.com/ -=- http://asterisk.org/developers/bug-guidelines - If you are not discussing a report already posted to the bugtracker, the discussion probably belongs in #asterisk. -=- Overall issue count: 328 -=- Monitor new reports in #asterisk-commits -=- Want to help? Test bugs marked Ready For Testing
11:56.44*** join/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@host198-234-dynamic.33-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it)
12:25.44*** join/#asterisk-bugs russellb (n=russell@asterisk/developer-and-stable-maintainer/drumkilla)
12:25.44*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o russellb] by ChanServ
13:06.17*** join/#asterisk-bugs michael-i (n=michael-@141.41.40.225)
13:44.16*** join/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@ip-212-18.sn1.eutelia.it)
13:49.18*** join/#asterisk-bugs elguero (n=elguero@ns1.nashuacs.com)
14:04.53*** join/#asterisk-bugs flujan (n=flujan@200-160-115-020.static.spo.ctbc.com.br)
14:06.35*** join/#asterisk-bugs elguero (n=elguero@ns1.nashuacs.com)
14:28.04*** join/#asterisk-bugs jsmith (n=jsmith@72.21.36.138)
16:09.57*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o jsmith-away] by ChanServ
16:18.32*** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@216.207.245.1)
16:18.32*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ
16:24.15*** join/#asterisk-bugs AdamWest (n=Leif@CPE001d7e2f9574-CM0012c9db3d2e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
16:34.29*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ
17:11.05*** join/#asterisk-bugs otherwiseguy (n=otherwis@CPE-75-81-49-192.kc.res.rr.com)
17:29.13*** join/#asterisk-bugs kpfleming (n=kpflemin@216.207.245.1)
17:29.13*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ
17:29.16*** join/#asterisk-bugs angler (n=angler@pdpc/sponsor/digium/angler)
17:29.19*** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=dwayne@216.207.245.1)
17:29.19*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ
17:29.19*** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@216.207.245.1)
17:29.19*** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ
18:32.18*** join/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@host12-235-dynamic.10-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it)
18:45.15*** part/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@host12-235-dynamic.10-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it)
18:45.30*** join/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@87.10.235.12)
19:47.49*** join/#asterisk-bugs BBHoss (n=hoss@c-71-207-173-38.hsd1.al.comcast.net)
19:48.26*** join/#asterisk-bugs agx (n=badpengu@81-174-46-57.dynamic.ngi.it)
20:13.31*** part/#asterisk-bugs agx (n=badpengu@81-174-46-57.dynamic.ngi.it)
20:56.36*** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@soll4-125.cust.blixtvik.net)
21:23.05Qwellhmm
21:23.12Qwellbug number has gotten fairly low today
21:24.25putnopvutSo why are you complaining?
21:24.35putnopvutI'm just messing with ya :)
21:24.59lmadsen326? slackers!
21:25.16lmadsenwoh... 290 in Asterisk though
21:25.22lmadsennicely done boys and.... file
21:26.22filelmadsen: !
21:26.59lmadsen:D
21:43.15*** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir)
21:43.26mvanbaakQwell: can we merge the transfer stuff for skinny ?
22:27.29Corydon76-vcchlmadsen: "things that is"?
22:32.42lmadseneh?
22:33.04Corydon76-vcchlmadsen: I was reading your email
22:33.23lmadsenoh I probably typed something weird because I was trying to multitask....
22:33.31mvanbaakI'm off to bed
22:33.35mvanbaakThu Feb 14 23:33:34 CET 2008
22:33.45Corydon76-vcchLittle early tonight, ain't?
22:33.52mvanbaakuhhuh
22:33.56mvanbaakI'm dead tired
22:34.09lmadsenheh
22:34.28mvanbaakhad 2 weeks where every day started at 6 AM and ended at 2 AM
22:34.56mvanbaakadd like a bottle of wine a day to that
22:35.12mvanbaakand you get the idea about how my life feels right now
22:35.23mvanbaaks/life/body/
22:36.10mvanbaakfirst meeting tomorrow is at 6:15 AM
22:36.12mvanbaakblegh
22:36.41mvanbaaklatero
22:42.23putnopvutM10873
22:42.24MuffinMan[new] [Asterisk] Resources/res_features 0010873: parkingcalls, by context with minim code change and not config changes. reported by tecnoxarxa  http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10873
22:42.29putnopvutCan someone explain the point of this patch?
22:49.27Qwellso that you can have somebody parked at 701 in [sales] and also 701 in [support]
22:49.29QwellI guess?
22:50.14putnopvutThe patch has some silliness in it and the explanation from the reporter doesn't make sense.
22:52.25russellbwhat he wants is multiple parking lots
22:52.30jsmithExactly.
22:52.41russellband without even looking, that implementation is not appropriate
22:52.46jsmithMultiple independent parking lots
22:52.50russellbright
22:52.58russellbwhich would be a _great_ project for anyone to take on
22:53.12Qwellwhat ever happened to multiparking?
22:53.13russellboej did it a long time ago, but there were some issues with his implementation, i think, i don't remember
22:53.23russellbi think it was just that mark wanted it converted to astobj
22:53.31russellbother than that i think it was tested and working well
22:53.59russellbso if someone wanted to take that (might still be in the bug tracker somewhere), and get his code ported to trunk, tested, and all that good stuff
22:54.02russellbthat would be a great use of your time.
22:54.12russellbthat's one the basic feature holes that we have ...
22:55.44russellbputnopvut: so i guess feel free to close that out with saying that we have another proposed implementation for multiple parking lots that is more in line with how we would like to do it ...
22:56.12russellbrefusing a patch is tough to do politely :-/
22:56.23putnopvutYeah, especially with a long overdue one.
22:56.35putnopvutThere is a multiple lots issue assigned to oej.
22:56.39QwellM6113
22:56.41MuffinMan[ready for testing] [Asterisk] Resources/res_features 0006113: [branch] Enhance parking to allow multiple parking lots reported by oej  http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=6113
22:56.42Qwellyeah
22:56.43putnopvutYeah, that one.
22:57.00putnopvutAh, I didn't realize he had reported it too.
22:57.20russellbyep, that's the one
22:57.34russellbdon't close 6113
22:57.39russellbthat's the one we should probably move forward with
22:57.55russellbor were you saying the other was long overdue, too ...
22:58.18Qwellyeah
22:58.27Qwellboth are
22:59.21putnopvutYeah, but the code on 10873 is bad in many ways and the last note on it says he applied the patch and got crashes all the time.
22:59.34putnopvutSo I'll just close it as politely as possible.
22:59.54russellbok, that sounds like a good plan
23:00.06russellbencourage him to monitor the other one so he can help test it once it's up to date
23:04.08QwellM4825
23:04.12MuffinMan[new] [Asterisk] Core/CodecInterface 0004825: [patch][post 1.4] New codec negotiation algorithm reported by bamby  http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4825
23:04.29Qwellyes or no?  If it isn't mergeable after 2.5 years, I'm going with no.
23:06.52putnopvutoh geez 600+ days over...
23:06.54QwellI think bkw's comment at the very beginning was spot on
23:07.13Qwell"This will have to be tested REALLY WELL before it can go in. The codec negociation stuff works fine as it is if you understand it. I suspect alot of people just don't understand how it works."
23:12.16russellbit's probably a no
23:12.25russellbbut they are right that we need some serious work in that area
23:12.36filethe codec negotiation stuff needs a taskforce
23:12.42putnopvutWhat are the flaws currently regarding codec negotiation?
23:12.42Qwellsure
23:12.42russellbthat patch is no longer up to date, and is maintained elsewhere ...
23:12.46russellbfile: yes it does
23:12.53QwellSO...
23:12.54Qwellclose?
23:12.55filecodec stuff in general even.
23:13.14russellbbeing able to re-neogotiate mid-call is a big thing
23:13.21russellbyes, codec stuff in general needs an overhaul
23:13.25Qwellclosing
23:13.35russellbvideocaps actually addresses some of the issues
23:14.11russellbpeople may get upset if that gets closed ...
23:14.21russellb_please_ be clear that we have a lot of serious plans in that area
23:14.22Qwellvideocaps?
23:14.27Qwelloh, this, yeah
23:14.46russellband that we _will_ address the issues that the patch was intended to address
23:16.58putnopvutWhat can I say. It's my job.
23:17.10fileI would offer you some of the pizza I just ordered... except you are there, and I am here
23:17.46russellbgo go swdev!
23:18.00russellbi'll be on bugs tomorrow
23:18.14russellbas i got my devstate project to the testing by the masses stage
23:19.03putnopvutI actually have some pizza at home...
23:19.16putnopvutNote to all Huntsvillains, Donato's is incredibly expensive.
23:19.24filebut so good
23:19.30putnopvutI ordered two pizzas last night, had  a $3 off coupon, and it still was $33.
23:19.34Qwellyikes
23:19.44putnopvutAdd in a tip, and it was $37.
23:22.19fileputnopvut: and how was it?
23:22.43putnopvutVery good.
23:22.47putnopvutBut not worth that much money.
23:23.07putnopvutI'm having to ration it into portions so that I can claim to have gotten 6-7 meals out of $37
23:23.12putnopvutThat way it doesn't seem quite as bad.
23:23.51putnopvutSo far I've gotten 2, and will be having number 3 tonight.
23:25.02fileand how do you prefer leftover pizza?
23:35.26QwellM4825
23:35.30MuffinMan[closed] [Asterisk] Core/CodecInterface 0004825: [patch][post 1.4] New codec negotiation algorithm reported by bamby  http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4825
23:35.51QwellI think that was the oldest open
23:36.29QwellM5413
23:36.31Qwellnew oldest
23:36.33MuffinMan[ready for testing] [Asterisk] Core/RTP 0005413: [patch] Secure RTP (SRTP) reported by mikma  http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5413
23:36.44putnopvutfile: no I don't actually.
23:36.45Qwellwait, no
23:36.48QwellM3450
23:36.50MuffinMan[ready for testing] [Asterisk] Core/NewFeature 0003450: [patch] adds support for SERVice maintenance messages reported by cmaj  http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=3450
23:36.55fileputnopvut: wha?
23:37.02putnopvutI like it fresh best.
23:37.12filewell that's a given
23:42.57russellbQwell: please ping mattf about that.
23:43.08russellband point out that it's the oldest issue on the tracker :)
23:43.18russellbwe may need a new libpri expert
23:43.32russellbbut at least get his current feeling/comments about the patch

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.