00:05.01 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
02:49.08 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=dwayne@216.207.245.1) |
02:49.08 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Juggie (i=Juggie@CPE001601df17fb-CM001a6682d7b6.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
02:49.08 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+oo Deeewayne Juggie] by irc.freenode.net |
02:49.10 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Corydon76-dig (i=indigo@pdpc/supporter/bronze/Corydon76-home) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
02:49.10 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs MuffinMan (n=muffins@neutrino.joshua-colp.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
02:49.10 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs file (n=file@asterisk/developer-and-muffin-lover/file) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
02:49.10 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+oo Corydon76-dig file] by irc.freenode.net |
02:52.34 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Pagautas (n=bigman@83.171.14.250) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
03:02.11 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jsmith (n=nnjsmith@72.21.36.138) |
03:02.11 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
03:27.52 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs russellb (n=russell@asterisk/developer-and-stable-maintainer/drumkilla) |
03:27.52 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o russellb] by ChanServ |
04:16.07 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
04:44.14 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
07:30.37 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@ip-212-18.sn1.eutelia.it) |
08:18.12 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@soll4-125.cust.blixtvik.net) |
08:29.34 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs snuff-home (i=snuff@220-253-11-146.VIC.netspace.net.au) |
09:53.07 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@ip-212-18.sn1.eutelia.it) |
10:28.18 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs snuff-home (i=snuff@220-253-11-146.VIC.netspace.net.au) |
11:56.29 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs infobot (i=ibot@pdpc/supporter/active/TimRiker/bot/apt) |
11:56.29 | *** topic/#asterisk-bugs is Asterisk Bugs Discussion -=- http://bugs.digium.com/ -=- http://asterisk.org/developers/bug-guidelines - If you are not discussing a report already posted to the bugtracker, the discussion probably belongs in #asterisk. -=- Overall issue count: 328 -=- Monitor new reports in #asterisk-commits -=- Want to help? Test bugs marked Ready For Testing |
11:56.44 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@host198-234-dynamic.33-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
12:25.44 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs russellb (n=russell@asterisk/developer-and-stable-maintainer/drumkilla) |
12:25.44 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o russellb] by ChanServ |
13:06.17 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs michael-i (n=michael-@141.41.40.225) |
13:44.16 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@ip-212-18.sn1.eutelia.it) |
13:49.18 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs elguero (n=elguero@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
14:04.53 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs flujan (n=flujan@200-160-115-020.static.spo.ctbc.com.br) |
14:06.35 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs elguero (n=elguero@ns1.nashuacs.com) |
14:28.04 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs jsmith (n=jsmith@72.21.36.138) |
16:09.57 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o jsmith-away] by ChanServ |
16:18.32 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@216.207.245.1) |
16:18.32 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
16:24.15 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs AdamWest (n=Leif@CPE001d7e2f9574-CM0012c9db3d2e.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
16:34.29 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o lmadsen] by ChanServ |
17:11.05 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs otherwiseguy (n=otherwis@CPE-75-81-49-192.kc.res.rr.com) |
17:29.13 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs kpfleming (n=kpflemin@216.207.245.1) |
17:29.13 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o kpfleming] by ChanServ |
17:29.16 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs angler (n=angler@pdpc/sponsor/digium/angler) |
17:29.19 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs Deeewayne (n=dwayne@216.207.245.1) |
17:29.19 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o Deeewayne] by ChanServ |
17:29.19 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs putnopvut (n=putnopvu@216.207.245.1) |
17:29.19 | *** mode/#asterisk-bugs [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ |
18:32.18 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@host12-235-dynamic.10-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
18:45.15 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@host12-235-dynamic.10-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
18:45.30 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs simbol76 (n=simbol@87.10.235.12) |
19:47.49 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs BBHoss (n=hoss@c-71-207-173-38.hsd1.al.comcast.net) |
19:48.26 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs agx (n=badpengu@81-174-46-57.dynamic.ngi.it) |
20:13.31 | *** part/#asterisk-bugs agx (n=badpengu@81-174-46-57.dynamic.ngi.it) |
20:56.36 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs oej (n=olle@soll4-125.cust.blixtvik.net) |
21:23.05 | Qwell | hmm |
21:23.12 | Qwell | bug number has gotten fairly low today |
21:24.25 | putnopvut | So why are you complaining? |
21:24.35 | putnopvut | I'm just messing with ya :) |
21:24.59 | lmadsen | 326? slackers! |
21:25.16 | lmadsen | woh... 290 in Asterisk though |
21:25.22 | lmadsen | nicely done boys and.... file |
21:26.22 | file | lmadsen: ! |
21:26.59 | lmadsen | :D |
21:43.15 | *** join/#asterisk-bugs fakhir (n=fakhir@unaffiliated/fakhir) |
21:43.26 | mvanbaak | Qwell: can we merge the transfer stuff for skinny ? |
22:27.29 | Corydon76-vcch | lmadsen: "things that is"? |
22:32.42 | lmadsen | eh? |
22:33.04 | Corydon76-vcch | lmadsen: I was reading your email |
22:33.23 | lmadsen | oh I probably typed something weird because I was trying to multitask.... |
22:33.31 | mvanbaak | I'm off to bed |
22:33.35 | mvanbaak | Thu Feb 14 23:33:34 CET 2008 |
22:33.45 | Corydon76-vcch | Little early tonight, ain't? |
22:33.52 | mvanbaak | uhhuh |
22:33.56 | mvanbaak | I'm dead tired |
22:34.09 | lmadsen | heh |
22:34.28 | mvanbaak | had 2 weeks where every day started at 6 AM and ended at 2 AM |
22:34.56 | mvanbaak | add like a bottle of wine a day to that |
22:35.12 | mvanbaak | and you get the idea about how my life feels right now |
22:35.23 | mvanbaak | s/life/body/ |
22:36.10 | mvanbaak | first meeting tomorrow is at 6:15 AM |
22:36.12 | mvanbaak | blegh |
22:36.41 | mvanbaak | latero |
22:42.23 | putnopvut | M10873 |
22:42.24 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Resources/res_features 0010873: parkingcalls, by context with minim code change and not config changes. reported by tecnoxarxa http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10873 |
22:42.29 | putnopvut | Can someone explain the point of this patch? |
22:49.27 | Qwell | so that you can have somebody parked at 701 in [sales] and also 701 in [support] |
22:49.29 | Qwell | I guess? |
22:50.14 | putnopvut | The patch has some silliness in it and the explanation from the reporter doesn't make sense. |
22:52.25 | russellb | what he wants is multiple parking lots |
22:52.30 | jsmith | Exactly. |
22:52.41 | russellb | and without even looking, that implementation is not appropriate |
22:52.46 | jsmith | Multiple independent parking lots |
22:52.50 | russellb | right |
22:52.58 | russellb | which would be a _great_ project for anyone to take on |
22:53.12 | Qwell | what ever happened to multiparking? |
22:53.13 | russellb | oej did it a long time ago, but there were some issues with his implementation, i think, i don't remember |
22:53.23 | russellb | i think it was just that mark wanted it converted to astobj |
22:53.31 | russellb | other than that i think it was tested and working well |
22:53.59 | russellb | so if someone wanted to take that (might still be in the bug tracker somewhere), and get his code ported to trunk, tested, and all that good stuff |
22:54.02 | russellb | that would be a great use of your time. |
22:54.12 | russellb | that's one the basic feature holes that we have ... |
22:55.44 | russellb | putnopvut: so i guess feel free to close that out with saying that we have another proposed implementation for multiple parking lots that is more in line with how we would like to do it ... |
22:56.12 | russellb | refusing a patch is tough to do politely :-/ |
22:56.23 | putnopvut | Yeah, especially with a long overdue one. |
22:56.35 | putnopvut | There is a multiple lots issue assigned to oej. |
22:56.39 | Qwell | M6113 |
22:56.41 | MuffinMan | [ready for testing] [Asterisk] Resources/res_features 0006113: [branch] Enhance parking to allow multiple parking lots reported by oej http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=6113 |
22:56.42 | Qwell | yeah |
22:56.43 | putnopvut | Yeah, that one. |
22:57.00 | putnopvut | Ah, I didn't realize he had reported it too. |
22:57.20 | russellb | yep, that's the one |
22:57.34 | russellb | don't close 6113 |
22:57.39 | russellb | that's the one we should probably move forward with |
22:57.55 | russellb | or were you saying the other was long overdue, too ... |
22:58.18 | Qwell | yeah |
22:58.27 | Qwell | both are |
22:59.21 | putnopvut | Yeah, but the code on 10873 is bad in many ways and the last note on it says he applied the patch and got crashes all the time. |
22:59.34 | putnopvut | So I'll just close it as politely as possible. |
22:59.54 | russellb | ok, that sounds like a good plan |
23:00.06 | russellb | encourage him to monitor the other one so he can help test it once it's up to date |
23:04.08 | Qwell | M4825 |
23:04.12 | MuffinMan | [new] [Asterisk] Core/CodecInterface 0004825: [patch][post 1.4] New codec negotiation algorithm reported by bamby http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4825 |
23:04.29 | Qwell | yes or no? If it isn't mergeable after 2.5 years, I'm going with no. |
23:06.52 | putnopvut | oh geez 600+ days over... |
23:06.54 | Qwell | I think bkw's comment at the very beginning was spot on |
23:07.13 | Qwell | "This will have to be tested REALLY WELL before it can go in. The codec negociation stuff works fine as it is if you understand it. I suspect alot of people just don't understand how it works." |
23:12.16 | russellb | it's probably a no |
23:12.25 | russellb | but they are right that we need some serious work in that area |
23:12.36 | file | the codec negotiation stuff needs a taskforce |
23:12.42 | putnopvut | What are the flaws currently regarding codec negotiation? |
23:12.42 | Qwell | sure |
23:12.42 | russellb | that patch is no longer up to date, and is maintained elsewhere ... |
23:12.46 | russellb | file: yes it does |
23:12.53 | Qwell | SO... |
23:12.54 | Qwell | close? |
23:12.55 | file | codec stuff in general even. |
23:13.14 | russellb | being able to re-neogotiate mid-call is a big thing |
23:13.21 | russellb | yes, codec stuff in general needs an overhaul |
23:13.25 | Qwell | closing |
23:13.35 | russellb | videocaps actually addresses some of the issues |
23:14.11 | russellb | people may get upset if that gets closed ... |
23:14.21 | russellb | _please_ be clear that we have a lot of serious plans in that area |
23:14.22 | Qwell | videocaps? |
23:14.27 | Qwell | oh, this, yeah |
23:14.46 | russellb | and that we _will_ address the issues that the patch was intended to address |
23:16.58 | putnopvut | What can I say. It's my job. |
23:17.10 | file | I would offer you some of the pizza I just ordered... except you are there, and I am here |
23:17.46 | russellb | go go swdev! |
23:18.00 | russellb | i'll be on bugs tomorrow |
23:18.14 | russellb | as i got my devstate project to the testing by the masses stage |
23:19.03 | putnopvut | I actually have some pizza at home... |
23:19.16 | putnopvut | Note to all Huntsvillains, Donato's is incredibly expensive. |
23:19.24 | file | but so good |
23:19.30 | putnopvut | I ordered two pizzas last night, had a $3 off coupon, and it still was $33. |
23:19.34 | Qwell | yikes |
23:19.44 | putnopvut | Add in a tip, and it was $37. |
23:22.19 | file | putnopvut: and how was it? |
23:22.43 | putnopvut | Very good. |
23:22.47 | putnopvut | But not worth that much money. |
23:23.07 | putnopvut | I'm having to ration it into portions so that I can claim to have gotten 6-7 meals out of $37 |
23:23.12 | putnopvut | That way it doesn't seem quite as bad. |
23:23.51 | putnopvut | So far I've gotten 2, and will be having number 3 tonight. |
23:25.02 | file | and how do you prefer leftover pizza? |
23:35.26 | Qwell | M4825 |
23:35.30 | MuffinMan | [closed] [Asterisk] Core/CodecInterface 0004825: [patch][post 1.4] New codec negotiation algorithm reported by bamby http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4825 |
23:35.51 | Qwell | I think that was the oldest open |
23:36.29 | Qwell | M5413 |
23:36.31 | Qwell | new oldest |
23:36.33 | MuffinMan | [ready for testing] [Asterisk] Core/RTP 0005413: [patch] Secure RTP (SRTP) reported by mikma http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5413 |
23:36.44 | putnopvut | file: no I don't actually. |
23:36.45 | Qwell | wait, no |
23:36.48 | Qwell | M3450 |
23:36.50 | MuffinMan | [ready for testing] [Asterisk] Core/NewFeature 0003450: [patch] adds support for SERVice maintenance messages reported by cmaj http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=3450 |
23:36.55 | file | putnopvut: wha? |
23:37.02 | putnopvut | I like it fresh best. |
23:37.12 | file | well that's a given |
23:42.57 | russellb | Qwell: please ping mattf about that. |
23:43.08 | russellb | and point out that it's the oldest issue on the tracker :) |
23:43.18 | russellb | we may need a new libpri expert |
23:43.32 | russellb | but at least get his current feeling/comments about the patch |